Monitor and address pay gaps with every hire and promotion with Payscale’s pay equity solution

Every organization, regardless of size or complexity, can access the right level of capability.

Talk to an expert

FAQ about the gender pay gap

Is the gender pay gap real?

Some people don’t believe the gender wage gap exists. Others acknowledge the data but argue it doesn’t reflect systemic disadvantages. They propose that women choose lower paying jobs because their primary role is to become mothers. Conversely, jobs where women are represented in higher percentages are paid less because women do these jobs.

These beliefs are precisely what gender pay gap research is designed to illuminate. Gender pay gap research measures the extent that women’s earnings are impacted by these beliefs.

What exactly is the gender pay gap?

The gender pay gap is the measured difference in earnings between women and men. It is typically reported in two ways: uncontrolled (the overall median earnings comparison without adjusting for factors like job, experience, or hours) and controlled (comparing pay for women and men in the same or similar jobs with similar qualifications).


Payscale’s 2026 Gender Pay Gap Report finds that women earn $0.82 for every dollar men earn when data are uncontrolled. When controlled for job and other compensable factors, the gap narrows but does not disappear, with women earning roughly $0.99 for every dollar men earn.

Are women deliberately paid less?

Organizations rarely set out to pay women less than men intentionally. Research shows that pay gaps persist due to a combination of factors including occupational sorting, differences in negotiation outcomes, and variations in how compensable factors are weighted. Studies have found that women are:


  • Less likely to be hired in male-dominated fields
  • Less likely to be promoted to leadership positions
  • Less likely to be paid fairly, especially in “masculine” jobs
  • More likely to face penalties for negotiating salaries


Every data point backs this up: women earn less than men even when they hold the same job title and controlling for compensable factors. This is demonstrated in Payscale’s Gender Pay Gap Report.

Are women disadvantaged at work?

Workplace structures and expectations vary across organizations. Data show that employees with caregiving responsibilities — disproportionately women — face different career outcomes than those without such responsibilities.

Organizations that offer caregiving accommodations may see different outcomes in retention and career progression for employees with family responsibilities.

Are women worse performers?

Some skeptics claim the controlled gender wage pay exists because women perform worse than men when doing the same or similar jobs. It may be true that women receive lower performance scores compared to men, which might help explain the gender pay gap as performance is a compensable factor.


Organizations should ensure that performance evaluation criteria are applied consistently across all employees. Research suggests that evaluation language and criteria can vary, and standardized, objective criteria help ensure performance assessments are based on job-related factors.

How can employers address pay gaps?

Policies that help close the gender pay gap focus on reducing hidden inequities and improving accountability. Pay transparency laws and clear salary ranges make it harder for unfair gaps to persist. Regular pay equity audits help employers identify and correct disparities before they grow. Standardized pay structures, job architecture, and consistent promotion criteria reduce bias in pay decisions.


Strong parental leave and flexible work policies help prevent career penalties tied to caregiving, which can expand employment opportunities for women. Banning salary history questions can stop past inequities from following workers. Finally, leadership commitment and ongoing measurement are essential to sustaining progress over time.

What’s the difference between equal pay and pay equity?

Equal pay refers to paying employees the same for performing the same job or substantially similar work, regardless of gender or other protected characteristics. It focuses on direct comparisons within identical roles. It is equivalent to the controlled gender pay gap.


Pay equity is broader: it examines whether compensation is fair across an organization, including differences in job levels, functions, career progression, and systemic barriers that may lead to pay gaps over time.


Pay equity looks at patterns, not just individual cases, and often involves analyzing pay practices, promotion access, and structural drivers of disparity to ensure fair outcomes across groups. There are legal reasons one employee can be paid more than another when doing the same job, such as company size, location, responsibilities, specialized skills, and performance.

What factors can legally explain pay gaps?

Legally, pay differences may be explained by compensable factors such as job level, relevant experience, tenure, education, specialized skills, geographic location, shift differentials, performance, productivity, or market-based pay for scarce roles. These must be applied consistently and documented.


Illegal pay gaps occur when differences are driven by protected characteristics such as gender, race, ethnicity, age, disability, or retaliation. Pay gaps are also unlawful if “neutral” factors are used as a cover for discrimination or if policies disproportionately disadvantage certain groups without business justification.

How often should employers conduct pay equity analysis?

Employers should think beyond a one-time audit and treat pay equity as an ongoing process alongside hiring and performance management. A growing best practice is to leverage compensation software to monitor pay equity continuously — with every hire, pay raise, promotion, or organizational change — so that potential disparities are caught before they widen.


Comprehensive analyses are commonly conducted at least annually as part of regular compensation planning, and many organizations also perform quarterly or semi-annual checks to stay ahead of emerging issues. Regular monitoring helps ensure fair pay outcomes and integrates pay equity into everyday compensation decisions and pay communications.